Friday, February 12, 2010

My partners x wife has made a false claim for child benefit in my daughters name, can she be charged?

Yes, report her for fraud. Thats pretty serious too.My partners x wife has made a false claim for child benefit in my daughters name, can she be charged?
Yep! it is fraud, but are you sure you want to start that war?My partners x wife has made a false claim for child benefit in my daughters name, can she be charged?
yes she definitely can! That's fraud!
yup, why not ??
definitely, report her now. what a disgusting person she is!
  • medium hair
  • Why can't Sean Hannity ever answer a tough question without resorting to name calling and false tales?

    His brain is attached to the republican party's zipper.Why can't Sean Hannity ever answer a tough question without resorting to name calling and false tales?
    Because he's an obnoxious liar. He constantly interrupts a speaker when he begins to lose an argument. I quit watching him.....)(Why can't Sean Hannity ever answer a tough question without resorting to name calling and false tales?
    He went to Catholic schools, maybe.
    He does answer tough questions. Shouldnt that question be ';Why can't Alec ';Domestic Abuser'; Baldwin ever answer a tough question without resorting to name calling and false tales?'; Yes Sean calls name but the people he uses his quick wit on deserve a good trouncing. Typical how a liberal acuses everyone of the very same things they are guilty of. I'm a conservitive but I only agree with 60% of what Sean says but he has just as much rights to call Richard Doofus Dreyfuss on his radio show a name as Madonna has of throwing grenades at a picture of the president in a music video.Freedom of speach works both ways never forget that, sir
    Because his facts are wrong. And he has a little penis.
    :-) I like Sean Hannity and I've seen him answer plenty of tough questions... it's Colmes I have a problem with, he talks too much.
    because he waltzes his way around any real answers, and hes a complete douche on top of that
    Because it takes the attention off the fact that he can't answer the tough question.

    True or False: Everyone named John is Nice...?

    and everyone named Ashley sleeps with your Dad?True or False: Everyone named John is Nice...?
    What makes you so sure about that whatever......?True or False: Everyone named John is Nice...?
    How in the hell did my whoreness earn you a violation?

    Report Abuse



    what about John Bobbitt?
    False and True
    Yes and yes.
    John Wayne Gacy was a sweetheart.


    I've known a few Ashleys, I don't think any of them have slept with my dad.
    well i know im nice
    well ive met a few johns and they are all nice guys...so from personal experience i can agree with that.





    though i dont think the second one is acurate...
    False and true, respectively.
    I think that is true. Remember John Jacob Jingle Himerschidt?


    Very good man.
    LOL





    Not always true
    WHOA, way false
    False


    False
    I know an assnamed John and the lady my dad sleeps with her name is Sylvia.

    President Harry S Truman did not have a first name. True or False?

    That should be, ';didn't have a MIDDLE name'; . . . and the answer is ';true';, he didn't have a middle name, just the ';S';.President Harry S Truman did not have a first name. True or False?
    Do you mean a middle name? His first name was Harry. His middle name was just the letter S - he had no real middle name.President Harry S Truman did not have a first name. True or False?
    Ulysses S. Grant's S wasn't correct either 鈥?not germane to the question but a good coincidence.

    True or False: Your Name Begins With A ';J';?

    True...My name is JennieTrue or False: Your Name Begins With A ';J';?
    False: It begins with STrue or False: Your Name Begins With A ';J';?
    FALSE =D
    False...it begins with an A. My dads name is James though.
    False.
    True
    false.
    False. Begins with a V.
    OMG Its true !!! How'd you know?
    False. It starts with a ';T';
    false
    that would be false
    false
    False it doesn't
    False
    False, but my sister's starts with a J
    true- I'm Jaymee
    True, my name is Jerk.
    False
    true
    no, a ''z''.
    False
    False... their is no ';J'; in my first, middle, or last name.





    (Corey Elizabeth _________)
    False...lol
    false
    false-my middle name is Jude
    False
    my last name does
    False mine starts with a L
    False, my name is Savannah
    False

    Can anyone name a few songs about false happiness?

    Chocolate by snow patrol


    amazing song





    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GV6-pVn3Y鈥?/a>

    How many false religions can you name?

    I think a better question would be can you name any true religions then we could all just answer no instead of having to list them all.How many false religions can you name?
    every one that does not serve God as he expects it. The Bible shows what you need to know to identify the right religion.





    The August 1, 2009 Watchtower Magazine has the theme ';How Can You Choose A Good Religion?';. It focuses on three mayor things True Religion promotes in it's believers according to the Bible. An excelent tool to auto evaluate anyone's believes. Ask local JW for a copy next time you see them.





    If you would like to know more about this and other themes, next time Jehovah's Witness come to your door, ask them for a free Bible study at your convenience. You will never regret all the knowledge you will acquire and remember that what you do with that knowledge is your choice. Knowledge + Application = WisdomHow many false religions can you name?
    It's said that there are 30,000 different religions, they all claim to be the true church so there are 29,999 false churches.


    Take your pick





    http://www.adherents.com/
    The worst are Mormonism, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Scientology.


    The others have some core of concealed, blurred truth in them.
    christianity, islam, zoroastrianism, judaism, pastafarianism, rastafarianism, hinduism, those are the ones that come to mind now
    All religions are true to someone, but they are all false to me.
    too many just look in your phone book
    0. A religion is true to a person, not to the whole world, which is why there can never be 'one true' religion.
    you can't use a double negative. religions by their nature are false.
    What makes you think ANY of them are FALSE?
    ALL of them.
    All of them.
    All of them except mine!
    all of them, do I get the 10 points ? oh, Atheism tops the list.
    It's not up to me to judge.
    How many are there?
    I don't have time to list them all.
    islam, mormons, any cult that denies the trinity...


    google this


    kingdom of the cults

    Should Fox News Change their name to False News?

    After all, they just concentrate on the past and over exaggerate on issues that are either no longer of concern to the American people or just smearing lies and unnecessary insults about Obama or DemocratsShould Fox News Change their name to False News?
    I've tuned in now and again and I have to say that I rarely see any news on Fox at all. They should change their name to Fox Neocon Opinion Channel. Opinion is ten times more of what they broadcast than news.





    Should Fox News Change their name to False News?
    Republicans are using Fox to wipe people off the map and out of populations. Fox won't stop until the global corporations control all of American life and everything represented in the US Constitution. But first Fox must help eliminate the middle class.





    When McCain defines the middle class as people worth $5 million, that means he is now wiping out all of the families worth from $70,000 up to $4,999,999.





    The middle class were the ones who pay most taxes that support the nation. McCain's scheme is to eliminate ownership of businesses, homes and everything else by the middle class.





    Be very afraid of Fox and McCain. They are handing middle class Americans over to global corporations who now control almost everything.





    But he has to keep you smiling and keep the propagandists convincing you that everything will be just fine, until you are picking potatoes in fields owned by the globals.
    Yes, they really should. It's such a shame that so many people watch. It's also a shame that they actually have a few shows I like.... But I do my best not to watch the Fox network. It's interesting that the Simpsons plays there, especially since they often make cracks at Fox and uneducated Americans....





    For those who'd like an example, most people who watched Fox believed that Saddam Hussein was directly linked to Osama bin Laden. This was never true. And CNN is international news. If you want the truth about how the rest of the world views America and what is going on, watch that. Better yet, Reuters or the BBC. Unless you are too scared that something ';liberal'; is ';Commie.'; Guess you better stop drinking tap water, too, since it's fluoridated...
    Not at all. Fox News is just like any other news channel. I watch some things on Fox, CNN, MSNBC, and PBS.





    I wonder how many people who hate Fox ever tried watching it. When it's just the news being reported, just like CNN, MSNBC, etc, it's fairly unbiased. It's only shows such as Hannity, O'Reilly, etc that have a decidely right-wing slant to them, just as Keith Olbermann, Chris Matthews, etc are definitely left-wing biased. Nothing wrong with either of them if you happen to agree with their views.





    What we need is a completely unbiased 24 hr news channel, without frothing at the mouth show hosts, that reports just the news. Let the viewer form their own opinion.
    When you have journalists actively cheering either Senator Obama (Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann) or Senator McCain (Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity) you no longer have journalism and news; you have entertainment with perhaps some minor informational value.


    There really is no more fair and balanced news media today, if there ever really was one in this country.
    I don't suppose you have anything to back up your claims of Fox News' supposed ';smearing lies'; or ';unnecessary insults'; do you?





    Just out of curiosity, have you ever actually watched Fox News or are you just forming an opinion based on what Fox's rival networks (CNN, MSNBC, etc.) and liberal bloggers say?
    If you are looking for the truth you will never find it on Fox. Fox is not a creditable news source. To buy into Fox version of facts, every News organization in the world in corrupt accept them.
    Here are some suggest names for Fox News:





    The Hate Channel


    Nuke non-Americans Channel


    Channel KKK


    White Pride Channel


    The Biased Channel
    Sure, Fox is biased. They tend to focus on the right. CNN is just as bad, but they focus on the left. You seem to be overlooking CNN.
    Seriously, specific examples of ';smearing lies'; and ';unnecessary insults'; would have gone a long way in adding some validity to your question.
    Faux News...I cannot stand this network, especially that chick with the dark hair that usually works on the weekends, she is a real peice of work, she really hates blacks..
    Yes. Or they should be renamed Faux news. They are not real news at all.
    FOX is a 24/7 news entrainment network, just like CNN and whatever else is on the air. I don't watch any of them.
    They should go ahead and just drop the ';news'; part too.
    Fox is nothing but a propoganda machine
    yes,UNFAIR and UNBALANCED COMEDY NETWORK!
    This is true and pretty hilarious
    Truth is hate to those who hate the truth.





    j
    yess! and cnn is the Communist news network!
    jealous
    No. Care to give us a quote or two--or are you just ranting?
    You have to have Fox news because it is fair and balanced. All the other networks are extreme left.

    True of False? Yahweh was the name given to the jewish god, initially spelled without vowels.?

    Not really. It is just ONE of the names of God. In fact, the first name for God used in the Torah is Elohim- the tetragamatton is only revealed much later.





    As for vowels- no hebrew is actually written with the vowel points. They were added when Achad Ha'Am and the other earfly zionists were reintroducing hebrew as an everyday modern language and wanted to make it easier for people to learn by putting the vowels in. Even so, modern hebrew, unless aimed at a second language audience, is written without vowels. On the other hand, you find that many books of the ancient hebrew are now being written WITH vowels to make them easier to study! (My copy of Midrash Rabba is written like this). So, you could effectively say that the vowel points in hebrew are actually teaching guides since they are only used by those not familiar enough with the manguage to do without them.





    As an example of the no usage of vowels in modern hebrew- it is easily seen on the official israeli government website:


    http://www.israel.gov.il/firstgovTrue of False? Yahweh was the name given to the jewish god, initially spelled without vowels.?
    trueTrue of False? Yahweh was the name given to the jewish god, initially spelled without vowels.?
    All of Hebrew is written without vowels and without spaces.





    The above sentence would be written this way.





    llfhbrwswrttnwthtvwls.





    About 100 years after Christ, scribes starting adding vowel points to the hebrew.





    In the Hebrew and the Greek bible of Jesus' day, God's name was continued to be used and pronounced.





    It was after Jesus' life that the divine name started to be pronounced as ';LORD';





    Wolfgang Feneberg comments in the Jesuit magazine Entschluss/Offen (April 1985): “He [Jesus] did not withhold his father’s name YHWH from us, but he entrusted us with it. It is otherwise inexplicable why the first petition of the Lord’s Prayer should read: ‘May your name be sanctified!’” Feneberg further notes that “in pre-Christian manuscripts for Greek-speaking Jews, God’s name was not paraphrased with kýrios [Lord], but was written in the tetragram form [YHWH] in Hebrew or archaic Hebrew characters. . . . We find recollections of the name in the writings of the Church Fathers;





    Professor George Howard of the University of Georgia wrote: “Since the Tetragram [four Hebrew letters for the divine name] was still written in the copies of the Greek Bible which made up the Scriptures of the early church, it is reasonable to believe that the N[ew] T[estament] writers, when quoting from Scripture, preserved the Tetragram within the biblical text.”—Journal of Biblical Literature, March 1977, p. 77.





    “In pre-Christian Greek [manuscripts] of the O[ld] T[estament], the divine name (yhwh) was not rendered by ‘kyrios’ [lord] as has often been thought. Usually the Tetragram was written out in Aramaic or in paleo-Hebrew letters. . . . At a later time, surrogates [substitutes] such as ‘theos’ [God] and ‘kyrios’ replaced the Tetragram . . . There is good reason to believe that a similar pattern evolved in the N[ew] T[estament], i.e. the divine name was originally written in the NT quotations of and allusions to the OT, but in the course of time it was replaced by surrogates.”—“New Testament Abstracts,” 3, 1977, p. 306.





    The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology (Volume 2, page 649) says: “One of the most fundamental and essential features of the biblical revelation is the fact that God is not without a name: he has a personal name, by which he can, and is to be, invoked.” Jesus certainly had that name in mind when he taught his followers to pray: “Our Father in the heavens, let your name be sanctified.”—Matthew 6:9.








    .





    .
    YHWH were the consonants, but the vowels are no longer known. Ancient Hebrew was written without vowels, so there's no written record of the name as originally pronounced. A Jewish superstition led to the discontinuation of using the name (Josephus makes mention of this in the first century), so the oral pronounciation was also lost, even though the consonants were preserved.





    Yahweh is an ';educated guess'; and should be very close to the way the name was pronunced by God himself when he revealed the name to his Jewish servants. But it's still a ';guess';.
    True





    YHWH -- there were no vowels in ancien t Hebrew. This is why the nameYHWH is known as the sacred tetragrammaton or the sacred four letter word.
    Maybe...





    a) ';Yahweh'; is the most widely accepted GUESS about how this name was pronounced. Most of the evidence comes from NAMES which include a form or part of the name, but not has the whole. (Common forms = Yah -- in all those ';-iah'; names [Isaiah, Jeremiah, Nehemiah, etc], and also an abbreviated form of the name used all by itself, e.g., Praise be to Yah!)





    b) ';initially spelled without vowels'; -- a bit misleading or confusing. In fact, ALL Hebrew words were spelled without vowels!! That's how their alphabet worked. It was only many centuries AFTER the Old Testament was written that scribes developed a method for marking in the vowels, as they understood them to be (by a system of dots written around the consonant text, called ';vowel points';).





    But it IS true that a tradition developed at some point (perhaps shortly after the Babylonian Captivity in the 6th century BC) of not PRONOUNCING this name. Note, it seems fairly clear that BEFORE the Exile the name WAS pronounced.





    Anyway, the tradition of not pronouncing the name --based, it seems, on the warning of the third commandment , ';Do not take the name of YHWH your God in vain'; -- meant using some sort of substitute wherever the name came up in writing. The most common substitute ended up being saying ';Adonai';, Hebrew for ';the Lord';.





    (This practice was picked up by ancient Greek translations of the Bible and is also reflected in many places where the New Testament has ';Lord'; [Greek ';kyrios';]. It is continued in many translations. For example, many English Bibles indicates YHWH by writing ';LORD'; --using small capitals, to distinguish this from places where the Hebrew texts actually does say ';Adonai';.)





    In fact, when scribes added vowel points they indicated that this is what one should say by adding the VOWELS for ';Adonai';. (The mistaken attempt by some Christians to pronounce these vowels with the consonants YHWH led to ';Yehowah'; or ';Jehovah';... which is really a NON-name.)
    True - there were no vowels in Hebrew
    True. The name of God was unpronounceable because God was seen to be unknowable.

    Does Cheney orchestrate FALSE FLAG TERROR in the name of zionism or in the name of $$$?

    Let's see how many minutes it takes the jooos at yahoo to approve this question.Does Cheney orchestrate FALSE FLAG TERROR in the name of zionism or in the name of $$$?
    I'm not Jewish pal. Not that that's a bad thing, I'm just not.


    I like Zionism, Israel is a modern liberal state among those backwards, medieval, muslim, rabid dogs.


    So what ';False Flag Terror'; are you going on about? Are you one of those ignorant ';conspiracy'; freaks? Have you ever thought that you believe that crap, because you want to believe that crap? It supports your personal agenda so you go with it. It doesn't have to be true, just sound good in your twisted mind.

    You can not change the name of a file using the COPY command? true or false?

    You can not change the name of a file using the COPY command





    true or false?You can not change the name of a file using the COPY command? true or false?
    You cannot use COPY to rename a file without creating a duplicate, so true. Instead, you would use the REN (or RENAME) command in DOS.You can not change the name of a file using the COPY command? true or false?
    in dos the command is:





    copy c:/file.ext c:/folder/file.ext where file.ext is the name of the original (source) and file.ext is the name of the copied file name.


    The do a ren (rename) ren file file2





    IN WINDOWS:


    Select the file and do a CNTL + C simultaneously and then o to where you want to copy it to and select the location and do a CTRL + V to paste it. Then righ on the copied file and select rename. There are other ways as well. Start with this but if you have any questions right click on the source you are tying to copy (in windows and look at what pops up.
    As far as I know, the copy command in itself will not change the file name unless you copy and paste into the exact same folder. If you do that, the pasted file will read ';Copy of ###';.


    Hope that helps.
    You could copy a file and then paste as another file name.
  • medium hair
  • For the story named FALSE FACE, could some people answer these questions for me?? they came from chapter 5-6..

    For the story named FALSE FACE, could some people answer these questions for me?? they came from chapter 5-6..


    here are the questions...


    Chapter5..


    -Describe Tom's expeience with the curator at the museum.What did he learn about the masks?Why didn't the natives want the mask back?


    -Identify what is being compared in the folowing simile..


    ';Curls that stood up all in the wrong directions like independent haystacks';. Pg40 of the book


    -Define: ledger pg 47, prominent pg50, antiquities pg51, mullein pg 53


    Chapter6......


    -Do you think it was wise for Laney to return to the bog to see if Tom was lying about the body?Why?


    -Why do you think Rosemary was so prejudiced against Native People?


    - Define: injectiojn pg57, coincidence pf 59, tenure pg 61








    Pleas only answer questions that you know..For the story named FALSE FACE, could some people answer these questions for me?? they came from chapter 5-6..
    No I won't help you. I hate it when people repeat question on this

    Should false rape accusers be ';named and shamed';?

    Should women who falsely claim rape have their pictures and names placed on websites and the like, just as sex offenders and ';deadbeat dads'; have their names and likenesses posted?Should false rape accusers be ';named and shamed';?
    The FBI has determined that a significant number of rape claims are in fact false. The majority of course are not, and all claims should be investigated.





    Should the false accuser be named? I suppose if the man's name was given, then this would be fair.





    I definitely think the false accuser should be charged, fined, and sentenced to the same extent that the falsely accused man was. If he did 2 years before it was determined he was innocent, then she does 2 years.





    Rape is a hideous crime, and anyone who accuses someone of committing rape as a means of getting revenge is very disturbed, and is also criminal.Should false rape accusers be ';named and shamed';?
    my husband is on bail until 28/05/09 as his ex of 11 years,2 children together,and tattoo shops together has cried rape.we are going through hell because of these false allegations.she is now a dominatrix her new partner a transvetite,n police,social services cant see why we worried

    Report Abuse



    Why only false rape accusers? Why not ALL people who falsely accuse others of a crime?





    Anyway, I'm going to say no, on the basis that failing to get a conviction doesn't automatically mean the person is innocent. And if people automatically got ';named and shamed'; whenever the defense won, the result would be that you'd have a nation full of people who are afraid to press charges for anything. Rape in particular is extremely difficult to prove, so probably you'd end up punishing a lot of legitimate rape victims who just didn't have enough physical evidence to make their case. However, if it can be 100% PROVEN that an accusation is false (which would be equally difficult), then the person who made it should get punished in some way.
    It makes more sense than naming and shaming men accused of rape who are found innocent. However it is probably better for everyone's identity to be kept confidential until proof of guilt is established. Of course if they ever make it a crime to make a false rape accusation, then false accusers should be named and also given a jail sentence because an accusation of rape can totally destroy a man's life. I notice that feminists spend a lot of time campaigning to close women's prisons and increasing convictions for rape, but spend no time discouraging false accusations.
    False accusers should be MORE than simply named and shamed. They should be sentenced to the same amount of time the man would have done if he were found guilty of what she accused him of, and then put on a registry of false accusers which would be available to the publc.


    These liars are just as dispicable as child molesters and should be treated as such.
    yes


    they not only make life a living hell for those they falsely accuse, but they make actual rapes less believable





    they should probably also be put on antipsychotics...you know someone that makes up that kind of stuff has serious mental probs








    EDIT:


    emily...what are your your fat, ugly, i can only get a guy by sucking up sources?


    according to http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimpro鈥?/a>


    Several interesting articles on sexual assault. The first is by CrimProf Michelle J. Anderson of Villanova, one of the legal academy's most perceptive and prolific scholars in this area. Her latest work The Legacy of the Prompt Complaint Requirement, Corroboration Requirement, and Cautionary Instructions on Campus Sexual Assault proposes a number of reforms to make institututional discipline more efficient. (CrimProf blogged an expose of UVa's system). One startling point in the paper was that no reliable statistics exist on the frequency of false rape claims: ';As a scientific matter, the frequency of false rape complaints to police or other legal authorities remains unknown.'; (See pages 33-35). Professor Anderson's conclusion is noteworthy in light of the often repeated claim of advocates that this information is known definitively: ';false accusations account for only 2% of all reported sexual assaults. This is no higher than false reports for other crimes.';





    btw..as you say the fbi says a good share of rapes are false...the cia tells me your father is also your brother
    Most assuredly they should. To accuse a man of rape literally ruins his life. Any woman who falsely accuses a guy of rape should certainly be ';named and shamed.';





    The key word here being ';falsely accused.'; If the rape allegations are true then the perp should be castrated, end of discussion.
    i remember that college in which feminists put up posters of random, innocent male students saying ';potential rapist';





    perhaps someone should put up pics of random, innocent female students saying ';potential false rape accuser';





    the guilty ones certainly should be named and shamed (and imprisoned). far too many get off with it by pleading ';womyn mental issues';
    Hell yeah. A falsely accused rapist is still viewed as a rapist in the eyes of SO many. It's a stigma that will follow the poor schmo for years.
    Yes, according to feminist figures AT LEAST 50% of rape reports are false. So there needs to be ways found to stop these people using theses laws as a weapon.








    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RliMu2JxV鈥?/a>
    Since there are only a few of the actual accuser that are making a false claim what would this action prove? Just because they are not believed does not make the claim false.
    Yes they should be. They should also be sentenced to lengthy prison terms.
    Yes.. They also deserve to be severely punish because they can ruin an innocent man life.
    Yes. They should be punished.
    In these times of equal rights,it should be done .Please go ahead and do it.
    If they are proven to be liars, yes. They should go to jail, as well.

    The Pennsylvania Gazette was the original name of the Saturday Evening Post. true or false?

    False. ';The Saturday Evening Post was a weekly magazine published in the United States from August 4, 1821 to February 8, 1969. From 1897, it was published by Curtis Publishing Company. Curtis claimed to be descended from The Pennsylvania Gazette founded in 1728 by Benjamin Franklin, although the magazine's first issue was published more than 30 years after Franklin's death.';








    Librarians--Ask Us, We Answer!


    Find your local Library at http://lists.webjunction.org/libweb/Publ鈥?/a>

    Could you please explain how using a false and erroneous name for God would be glorifying to Him?

    Jehovah's Witnesses insist that we need to call our God Jehovah. Majority of dictionaries and encyclobedia that you look at under the heading of ';Jehovah';, it says Jehovah is a false and erroneus pronunciation for the name of God of the Bible.





    And do not say that Jehovah is the English pronunciation of the Hebrew word 'Yahweh' because that is not true. If you insist, show me something by a scholar that confirms that statement.Could you please explain how using a false and erroneous name for God would be glorifying to Him?
    It's what's in your heart and mind is what really matters. All other corrections will be made at a later date. With so much bibical and historical distortations throughout the ages, it's almost impossible to tell.Could you please explain how using a false and erroneous name for God would be glorifying to Him?
    According to www.m-w.com





    Main Entry: Je•ho•vah


    Pronunciation: \ji-ˈhō-və\


    Function: noun


    Etymology: New Latin, reading (as Yĕhōwāh) of Hebrew yhwh Yahweh with the vowel points of 'adhōnāy my lord


    Date: 1530











    In its section under the Greek word Ky´ri•os (“Lord”), Robinson’s A Greek and English Lexicon of the New Testament (printed in 1859) says that it means “God as the Supreme Lord and sovereign of the universe, usually in Sept[uagint] for Heb[rew] יהוה Jehovah.” Hence, in places where the Christian Greek Scripture writers quote the earlier Hebrew Scriptures, the translator has the right to render the word Ky´ri•os as “Jehovah” wherever the divine name appeared in the Hebrew original.





    Strong’s Hebrew dictionary





    yeh-ho-vaw'


    From H1961; (the) self Existent or eternal; Jehovah, Jewish national name of God: - Jehovah, the Lord. Compare H3050, H3069.











    Gesenius in his Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon of the Old Testament Scriptures agrees saying:


    ';Those who consider that YHWH [Yehowah] was the actual pronunciation


    are not altogether without ground on which to defend their opinion.


    In this way can the abbreviated syllables YHW [Yeho] and YH [Yo],


    with which many proper names begin, be more satisfactorily explained





    The following text is found in the first sentence of the article:JEHOVAH in William Smith's 1863 ';A Dictionary of the Bible';:


    ';JEHOVAH ( יְהֹוָה, usually with the vowel points of אֲדֹנָי ; but when the two occur together, the former is pointed יֱהֹוִה, that is with the vowels of אֱלֹהִים, as in Obad. i. 1, Hab. iii. 19:';


    The two vocalizations of the Tetragrammaton shown in bold type above, were both critiqued by John Drusius in 1604 A.D., however as noted below, Davidson defends the vowel points of יְהֹוָה. [See also sub section 3.1 above.]


    In Scott Jones Article:Jehovah under the heading ';Davidson on the Tetragrammaton';, Davidson explains why he believes that the fact that the Masoretes did not point יְהֹוָה with the precise same vowel points as are found in Adonay indicated that the vowel points of יְהֹוָה are the actual vowel points of God's name.


    • The vocalized Hebrew spelling ';Yahweh'; is found in no extant Hebrew text.


    • The central ';ou'; or ';o'; in some Greek transcriptions point to a pronunciation with a ';u'; or ';o'; vowel in the middle, i.e. ';Yehowa';.


    However Greek, since it stopped using the digamma, when transcribing foreign words and names has had to write the ';w'; consonant sound as a vowel ';u'; or similar (or in later times as β, after the Greek pronunciation of β changed from ';b'; to ';v';).
    God is the correct name for God because it is ';DOG'; spelled backwards. That's because a dogs' unconditional love for us is Gods' gift of a real life example of his love for us and it is the only animal god actually named himself, being a mirror of his own name to remind us.





    This mostly forgotten fact is also proof that God speaks English, since this doesn't work in other languages. So only prayers in English are heard.
    So God is now upset at people mispronouncing his name? He is a touchy one that Grinch.





    Religion is Harmful, here we have normally rational people fighting over the right way to pronounce God.......
    You are not Jewish and when I pray I ask God and Jesus. When I pray, I ask God and Jesus Christ.





    What Jehovah's Witness is mess up on is making gentile act like Jew when it not. When they say they are the Jew, it is heresy. Jew used hebrew and Jehovah is hebrew after being translated to English language of course regardless of what was edited into Wikipedia.
    Neiher are pronounceable in English exactly the way it was pronounced when the term was coined during the authorship of the Pentateuch, so what's the point?





    Why not call him Eloi? Remember ';Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?';
    ALLAH is the real name since Arabic was the first spoken language on earth
    What difference, really, whether you call ';Him'; Jehovah, G-D, Yahweh, Allah or Zeuss?





    If glorifying ';Him'; is what you believe in, then wouldn't that be accomplished by what is in your heart and by how you act?





    Why do people get so hung up on this stupid, petty stuff that they overlook what's really important?
    All we say is use the name that is recognized in your language as the name of God.





    Where I live, it is not Jehovah. It is Iyegova. When you say that, everyone knows whom you are referring to.





    It is hypocritical to say that since Jehovah is not the way it was pronounced we should ot say it at all, when we say ';Jesus'; all the time, but that is NOT how it was pronounced.





    Many people have a problem, not with the fact that Jehovah is the accepted pronunciation in English, but with the fact that the name is now so associated with Jehovah's Witnesses and that would be admitting that they have been right all along.





    And I guess you can't have that, now can you?
    No human today can be certain how it was originally pronounced in Hebrew. Why not? Biblical Hebrew was originally written with only consonants, no vowels. When the language was in everyday use, readers easily provided the proper vowels. In time, however, the Jews came to have the superstitious idea that it was wrong to say God’s personal name out loud, so they used substitute expressions. Centuries later, Jewish scholars developed a system of points by which to indicate which vowels to use when reading ancient Hebrew, but they put the vowels for the substitute expressions around the four consonants representing the divine name. Thus the original pronunciation of the divine name was lost.





    Many scholars favor the spelling “Yahweh,” but it is uncertain and there is not agreement among them. On the other hand, “Jehovah” is the form of the name that is most readily recognized, because it has been used in English for centuries and preserves, equally with other forms, the four consonants of the Hebrew Tetragrammaton.





    J. B. Rotherham, in The Emphasised Bible, used the form Yahweh throughout the Hebrew Scriptures. However, later in his Studies in the Psalms he used the form “Jehovah.” He explained: “JEHOVAH—The employment of this English form of the Memorial name . . . in the present version of the Psalter does not arise from any misgiving as to the more correct pronunciation, as being Yahwéh; but solely from practical evidence personally selected of the desirability of keeping in touch with the public ear and eye in a matter of this kind, in which the principal thing is the easy recognition of the Divine name intended.”—(London, 1911), p. 29.





    After discussing various pronunciations, German professor Gustav Friedrich Oehler concluded: “From this point onward I use the word Jehovah, because, as a matter of fact, this name has now become more naturalized in our vocabulary, and cannot be supplanted.”—Theologie des Alten Testaments, second edition (Stuttgart, 1882), p. 143.





    Jesuit scholar Paul Joüon states: “In our translations, instead of the (hypothetical) form Yahweh, we have used the form Jéhovah . . . which is the conventional literary form used in French.”—Grammaire de l’hébreu biblique (Rome, 1923), footnote on p. 49.





    Most names change to some extent when transferred from one language to another. Jesus was born a Jew, and his name in Hebrew was perhaps pronounced Ye·shu′a‛, but the inspired writers of the Christian Scriptures did not hesitate to use the Greek form of the name, I·e·sous′. In most other languages the pronunciation is slightly different, but we freely use the form that is common in our tongue. The same is true of other Bible names. How, then, can we show proper respect for the One to whom the most important name of all belongs? Would it be by never speaking or writing his name because we do not know exactly how it was originally pronounced? Or, rather, would it be by using the pronunciation and spelling that are common in our language, while speaking well of its Owner and conducting ourselves as his worshipers in a manner that honors him?
    It doesn't glorify God at all. I would just call God father like Jesus did. No one knows that name, no one.
    It's not the name you choose to call Him that matters. It's belief in His Son Jesus Christ.
    The word Yahweh, or YHWH in Hebrew can be transliterated either YHWH, YHVH, JHWH or JHVH in English (since y and j have made interchangable in English translations of Hebrew words, although J is more accurate, and since w and v are effectively the same letter, a la German and Latin). So, any of those are valid (with Jehovah coming from JHVH)
    '; By combining the vowel signs of 'Adho.nay and 'Elo.him' with the four consonants of the Tetragrammaton the pronunciations Yeho.wah' and Yehowih' were formed. The first of these provided the basis for the Latinized form ';Jehova(h).'; The first recorded use of this form dates from the thirteenth century C.E. Raymundus Martini, a Spanish monk of the Dominican Order, used it in his book Pugeo Fidei of the year 1270. Hebrew scholars generally favor ';Yahweh'; as the most likely pronunciation.(6)';





    In Christ


    Fr. Joseph
    In English it used to be common practice to substitute in ';J'; for the ';Y'; sound in non-latin alphabets.


    Thus Iesus became Jesus.


    Yehudah became Judah.


    As recently as thirty years ago they would have transliterated the Russian name Yaroslav as Jaroslav...


    This is exactly what happened with Jehovah - it is the anglicised spelling of the Hebrew word with the letters Yud-He-Vav-He which is most commonly transliterated as Yehovah or Yahweh if you wish.


    You are right that this is the wrong pronounciation because no one knows how to pronounce this word except for the most learned Jewish ';mystics';. Historicaly, this word was never pronounced except by the High Priest in the Temple in Jerusalem in the innermost sanctum on particular days of the year.
    How do you know ';God'; is the real name?
    Does your faith rest on denigrating the faith of others? if so, then schisms have done thier duty, shifting the debate from whether or not a god exists, to ';Which god, which way'; is the right god
    Any name will do for an imaginary being.
    In all love,





    There are very select few that know ';the'; name of God as revealed to Abraham.





    The spelling and enunciation of even the names of the prophets are not widely known now as they were in the time of either of the prophets.





    Some who assumes that they have it ';right'; and that others do not, may only be eating the fruit of the tree.





    Just look at how the name Jesus is spelled and pronounced throughout the world. None of the popular spellings in different languages or pronunciations are faithful to how it was during his lifetime. According to most scholars, it was spelled in an ancient form of Aramaic not used today. And the best they can tell his name was pronounced Yeshua.





    For an interesting read on the subject of the “real” name of Jesus go to this web site:





    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yeshua_%28n…





    If you think, glory, worship and salvation is found in correctly pronouncing a word, perhaps further prayer and study is in order.





    But of course, perhaps not, as you may be the one who knows. If so, lead us!





    Seriously!





    Otherwise be still and listen to the inner light of divine love. For my dear, love is the answer.





    Blessings and peace to all,


    All in all,


    B
    Be careful girl, I just got one of my questions deleted today about this subject.


    But I asked a new.





    Yes, they call their God with the wrong name. It would not be so funny if they did not insist that we need to call Him with the proper name. I am happy I can call my Lord as the Father, Jesus, or even Jehovah, and He knows when I am talking to Him.

    True or false. Monera is the name of a biological kingdom?

    trueTrue or false. Monera is the name of a biological kingdom?
    TrueTrue or false. Monera is the name of a biological kingdom?
    There are 5 kingdoms in American biological taxonomy:





    Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, Protoctista, Archaea, and Monera





    Monera are typically singled-celled organism, like bacteria, which do not have a true nucleus, also called Prokaryotae.
    hey baby, it's true.
    Affirmative! It is true! Monera is a name for a biological kingdom!

    For the story named FALSE FACE, could some people answer these questions for me?? they came from chapter 5-6..

    For the story named FALSE FACE, could some people answer these questions for me?? they came from chapter 5-6..


    here are the questions...


    Chapter5..


    -Describe Tom's expeience with the curator at the museum.What did he learn about the masks?Why didn't the natives want the mask back?


    -Identify what is being compared in the folowing simile..


    ';Curls that stood up all in the wrong directions like independent haystacks';. Pg40 of the book


    -Define: ledger pg 47, prominent pg50, antiquities pg51, mullein pg 53


    Chapter6......


    -Do you think it was wise for Laney to return to the bog to see if Tom was lying about the body?Why?


    -Why do you think Rosemary was so prejudiced against Native People?


    - Define: injectiojn pg57, coincidence pf 59, tenure pg 61








    Pleas only answer questions that you know..For the story named FALSE FACE, could some people answer these questions for me?? they came from chapter 5-6..
    1. Baltomore Orioles


    2. Lemon meringue pie, lightly baked


    3. Central Europe, circa 1920


    4. pi r squared


    5. Lazy do-nothing mooches that expect everyone else do do their work for them.


    6. Yes, I would like fries with that.
  • medium hair
  • For the story named FALSE FACE, could some people answer these questions for me?? they came from chapter 5-6..

    For the story named FALSE FACE, could some people answer these questions for me?? they came from chapter 5-6..


    here are the questions...


    Chapter5..


    -Describe Tom's expeience with the curator at the museum.What did he learn about the masks?Why didn't the natives want the mask back?


    -Identify what is being compared in the folowing simile..


    ';Curls that stood up all in the wrong directions like independent haystacks';. Pg40 of the book


    -Define: ledger pg 47, prominent pg50, antiquities pg51, mullein pg 53


    Chapter6......


    -Do you think it was wise for Laney to return to the bog to see if Tom was lying about the body?Why?


    -Why do you think Rosemary was so prejudiced against Native People?


    - Define: injectiojn pg57, coincidence pf 59, tenure pg 61








    Pleas only answer questions that you know..For the story named FALSE FACE, could some people answer these questions for me?? they came from chapter 5-6..
    Wikipedia has the whole summary and analysis for this book

    For the story named FALSE FACE, could some people answer these questions for me?? they came from chapter 5-6..

    For the story named FALSE FACE, could some people answer these questions for me?? they came from chapter 5-6..


    here are the questions...


    Chapter5..


    -Describe Tom's expeience with the curator at the museum.What did he learn about the masks?Why didn't the natives want the mask back?


    -Identify what is being compared in the folowing simile..


    ';Curls that stood up all in the wrong directions like independent haystacks';. Pg40 of the book


    -Define: ledger pg 47, prominent pg50, antiquities pg51, mullein pg 53


    Chapter6......


    -Do you think it was wise for Laney to return to the bog to see if Tom was lying about the body?Why?


    -Why do you think Rosemary was so prejudiced against Native People?


    - Define: injectiojn pg57, coincidence pf 59, tenure pg 61








    Pleas only answer questions that you know..For the story named FALSE FACE, could some people answer these questions for me?? they came from chapter 5-6..
    Hi there,





    It looks like you'd be better off teaming up with someone in your class.





    Peace

    True or false: Your name printed looks the same as when it is in script?

    in your handwriting?True or false: Your name printed looks the same as when it is in script?
    Unfortunately, no.





    My handwriting is messy no matter what. In fact, it's probably worse. Then again, I'm a healthcare professional.





    EMTTrue or false: Your name printed looks the same as when it is in script?
    ummm I guess so
    Somewhat
    False, It's a bit neater.
    true
    false